Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instrument issued by eligible on SSE

India’s Corporate Social Responsibility framework has steadily evolved from a model focused primarily on expenditure and compliance towards one that increasingly emphasises transparency, accountability, measurable outcomes and responsible allocation of resources. A significant development in this journey came on 27 May 2026, when the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notified the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2026 through Notification No. G.S.R. 415(E). The amendment introduces an express mechanism through which companies can undertake CSR activities by subscribing to Zero Coupon Zero Principal (ZCZP) Instruments issued by eligible Not-for-Profit Organisations registered with the Social Stock Exchange.

For companies, CSR committees, boards, CFOs, company secretaries, CSR professionals and eligible NGOs, this is an important regulatory development. It creates a formal connection between the CSR framework under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Social Stock Exchange framework regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India. In practical terms, the amendment gives companies an additional route for deploying a limited portion of their CSR expenditure through a regulated social-finance mechanism. For NGOs, it creates another potential avenue for mobilising institutional funding for defined social and environmental projects.

At Drishti Foundation Trust, we view this development as particularly relevant to the future of responsible social finance in India. Organisations working in environmental conservation, biodiversity, water conservation, sustainable development, disaster response, education and community development increasingly need funding mechanisms that combine financial discipline with demonstrable social and environmental outcomes. The 2026 amendment has the potential to strengthen this ecosystem, provided companies and NGOs understand the regulatory conditions and approach the mechanism with appropriate due diligence.

What has changed under the Companies (CSR Policy) Amendment Rules, 2026?

The most important change is the insertion of a new Rule 4A into the Companies (CSR Policy) Rules, 2014. Rule 4A specifically permits a company to carry out CSR activities through a Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instrument. However, the expenditure incurred through this route cannot exceed 10% of the company’s total CSR expenditure for that financial year.

The amendment also introduces two definitions into Rule 2 of the CSR Rules. The first defines a Not-for-Profit Organisation, by referring to the meaning assigned under Regulation 292A of the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018. The second defines a Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instrument as an instrument declared as a security, issued by a Not-for-Profit Organisation registered with the Social Stock Exchange segment of a recognised stock exchange in accordance with SEBI regulations.

These changes are important because they establish a direct regulatory bridge between the CSR framework and the Social Stock Exchange. Previously, the SSE existed as a mechanism for social-sector fundraising within the securities-market architecture. The 2026 CSR amendment now expressly recognises ZCZP instruments as a route through which companies can implement part of their CSR activities.

What is a Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instrument?

A Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instrument, commonly abbreviated as Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instrument, is a security issued by an eligible Not-for-Profit Organisation registered with the Social Stock Exchange. As the name indicates, it does not carry a conventional coupon or interest payment and does not involve repayment of principal to the subscriber. Its economic character is therefore substantially different from an ordinary debt security. The instrument is designed to mobilise funds for social-impact activities through the regulated SSE framework.

The ZCZP mechanism should not therefore be understood as an investment where a company subscribes with an expectation of financial return. In the context of an NPO, the contribution is fundamentally directed towards financing an eligible social project or activity. The securities-market structure provides a framework for disclosure, listing, reporting and transparency around the mobilisation and deployment of funds.

This is one of the reasons why the mechanism is significant for India’s social sector. It attempts to combine the accountability associated with a regulated market framework with the grant-oriented nature of social-sector funding.

Why has the government introduced this mechanism?

India has a large and diverse CSR ecosystem. Companies contribute significant resources to education, healthcare, environmental sustainability, rural development, livelihoods, water conservation, sanitation, disaster management and other areas covered under the CSR framework. At the same time, many credible NGOs require predictable and institutional funding to implement larger projects.

The Social Stock Exchange was designed to provide a structured platform connecting social enterprises with fund providers. The introduction of ZCZP instruments created a mechanism through which eligible NPOs could mobilise funds for social projects under the SSE framework.

The 2026 CSR amendment addresses an important regulatory question: Can a company use its CSR expenditure to subscribe to a ZCZP instrument issued through the Social Stock Exchange? The new Rule 4A provides an express statutory route, subject to the prescribed conditions, including the 10% ceiling. A corresponding amendment to Schedule VII also expressly recognises subscription to ZCZP instruments on the Social Stock Exchange as a permissible CSR activity.

The combined effect is important. The CSR Rules provide the implementation mechanism, while the Schedule VII amendment provides explicit recognition of the activity within the statutory CSR framework.

What is the 10% limit for ZCZP Instruments?

The 10% limit is one of the most important provisions companies need to understand.

Rule 4A states that a company may carry out CSR activities through a ZCZP Instrument, provided that the expenditure incurred for such instrument does not exceed 10% of the total CSR expenditure of the company for that financial year.

This means that the ZCZP route is not intended to replace a company’s entire CSR programme. It is an additional mechanism through which a limited portion of annual CSR expenditure can be deployed.

For example, if a company’s total CSR expenditure for a financial year is ₹10 crore, the expenditure through ZCZP Instruments under this specific provision would be capped at ₹1 crore. The remaining CSR expenditure would continue to be dealt with through other permissible CSR implementation mechanisms.

This limitation is significant from a CSR strategy perspective. Companies should therefore view ZCZP subscriptions as one component of a diversified CSR portfolio, rather than as a complete alternative to direct project implementation or implementation through eligible agencies.

Is ZCZP subscription mandatory for companies?

No. The language of Rule 4A is permissive. It states that a company may carry out CSR activities through a ZCZP Instrument. Therefore, the amendment creates an additional option rather than imposing a new obligation.

Companies can continue to implement CSR activities through other permissible mechanisms under the CSR framework. The ZCZP route can be considered where the company’s CSR objectives align with a project being offered by an eligible NPO through the Social Stock Exchange and where the company’s internal governance processes support such a subscription.

This distinction is important. The existence of a new financial mechanism does not mean that every company should use it. The appropriate CSR implementation model should depend on the company’s CSR policy, project objectives, geographical priorities, beneficiary requirements, due diligence findings and internal governance framework.

What happens to impact assessment under the new rules?

Another important feature of Rule 4A is the impact assessment exemption.

The amendment provides that a company that has subscribed to a ZCZP Instrument shall be exempted from undertaking impact assessment of any project funded through such an instrument.

This provision can reduce a specific compliance burden for the subscribing company. However, companies should not interpret the exemption as meaning that impact measurement is unimportant.

Impact assessment and impact monitoring are different concepts. Even where a formal statutory impact assessment is not required under the specific provision, a company may still need appropriate project monitoring, utilisation verification, reporting and governance oversight. A responsible CSR strategy should continue to ask whether the funded intervention is producing the intended outcomes.

For an NGO, this also means that the quality of project design remains critical. A well-designed ZCZP project should have clear objectives, beneficiaries, activities, timelines, expected outputs and measurable outcomes even if the subscribing company receives an exemption from a particular impact-assessment requirement.

What responsibilities does the issuing NPO have?

The 2026 amendment places specific responsibilities on the Not-for-Profit Organisation issuing the ZCZP Instrument and raising funds through it.

The NPO must undertake a project with a duration of not more than three succeeding financial years from the issue of the ZCZP Instrument. This requirement establishes a defined project horizon and discourages indefinite deployment of funds under an individual instrument.

The NPO also has a specific responsibility when the listing of the ZCZP Instrument terminates. Any unspent amount must be transferred to a fund included in Schedule VII to the Companies Act, 2013, and the NPO must submit its compliance report to SEBI.

This is a significant accountability provision. It means that funds raised through a ZCZP instrument cannot simply remain indefinitely with the issuing organisation after the instrument’s listing period comes to an end.

For NPOs considering the SSE route, financial planning must therefore be closely connected to the project implementation timeline.

Why is the three-year project period important?

The three-year limitation has practical implications for CSR project design.

An NPO preparing a ZCZP fundraising proposal needs to define a project that can realistically be completed within the permitted period. The organisation should establish milestones, budgets, implementation responsibilities, monitoring systems and reporting arrangements before raising funds.

This can encourage better project discipline. Instead of presenting broad organisational funding requirements, an NPO may need to articulate a clearly defined intervention with a specific implementation period and funding requirement.

For example, an environmental organisation may propose a three-year biodiversity restoration programme covering a defined landscape. The project could include baseline ecological assessment, native species restoration, community participation, habitat improvement, monitoring and post-intervention assessment. Similarly, a water conservation project could define a specific watershed, intervention sites, community institutions, construction or restoration activities and measurable water-related indicators.

The more clearly a project Is structured, the easier It becomes for a corporate subscriber to understand what its CSR contribution is intended to support.

How does the Social Stock Exchange fit into the new CSR framework?

The Social Stock Exchange is central to the ZCZP mechanism.

An NPO cannot simply create an informal instrument and classify it as a ZCZP Instrument for CSR purposes. The instrument must meet the applicable SEBI requirements and be issued by an eligible NPO registered with the Social Stock Exchange segment of a recognised stock exchange.

This creates an important compliance chain involving the NPO, Social Stock Exchange, SEBI framework, company, CSR governance structure and the Companies Act framework.

The SSE framework is intended to increase transparency in the social-finance ecosystem. NPOs participating in this system are required to meet eligibility and disclosure requirements, while fundraising instruments are subject to the applicable securities-market processes.

For companies, this can provide an additional layer of institutional structure when evaluating potential social-sector funding opportunities.

What does the amendment mean for NGOs?

For NGOs, the amendment creates an opportunity to access a new category of institutional CSR funding.

However, the opportunity comes with corresponding responsibilities. An organisation interested in raising funds through ZCZP Instruments should evaluate whether it meets the requirements for registration with the Social Stock Exchange and whether its governance, financial records, impact reporting and programme systems are sufficiently mature.

The organisation also needs to understand that SSE fundraising is not simply another form of grant application. It involves a more structured disclosure and securities-market framework.

An NGO should therefore be prepared to clearly explain its social objective, target population, project methodology, funding requirement, implementation period, expected results and reporting arrangements.

For organisations such as Drishti Foundation Trust, working across environmental conservation, biodiversity, water conservation, disaster response, sustainable development and community-oriented programmes, this framework highlights the importance of converting field experience into well-defined, measurable and documented projects.

What does this mean for corporate CSR committees?

For CSR committees, the amendment introduces another implementation option that should be evaluated through the company’s existing CSR governance process.

The committee should consider whether a proposed ZCZP subscription is aligned with the company’s CSR policy and Schedule VII objectives, whether the issuing NPO is eligible, whether the project is suitable for the company’s strategic priorities and whether appropriate due diligence has been completed.

The committee should also understand the 10% ceiling and ensure that the company’s overall CSR expenditure remains compliant with applicable provisions.

A ZCZP subscription should not be approved merely because it is listed on an SSE. The company’s normal standards of governance, due diligence, project relevance and financial oversight should continue to apply.

What due diligence should companies undertake?

Companies considering ZCZP Instruments should conduct appropriate due diligence on the issuing NPO.

This can include verification of the organisation’s legal status, Social Stock Exchange registration, relevant statutory registrations, audited financial statements, governance structure, prior programme experience, project history, financial management systems and compliance record.

The company should also understand the specific project being funded. Questions should include: What problem is the project addressing? Who are the beneficiaries? Where will the project be implemented? What is the project duration? What are the expected outcomes? How will funds be utilised? What monitoring and reporting arrangements are proposed?

The company should also examine whether the project aligns with its CSR policy and broader sustainability priorities.

The presence of a regulated instrument does not eliminate the need for responsible corporate due diligence.

ZCZP Instruments and environmental CSR

The new mechanism may be particularly relevant to environmental and sustainability-focused CSR.

Environmental projects often require multi-year funding. River restoration, biodiversity conservation, water security, ecological restoration, native species plantation, wetland conservation and community-based natural resource management can take several years to produce measurable results.

A defined ZCZP project can potentially provide an appropriate structure for such interventions, provided the project meets the applicable eligibility requirements.

For example, a company seeking to support water conservation could subscribe to a ZCZP Instrument supporting a defined watershed restoration programme. The project could establish indicators covering water-harvesting structures, restored water bodies, community participation, ecological improvements and other appropriate outcomes.

Similarly, a biodiversity project could establish indicators related to habitat restoration, native species, ecological monitoring and community participation.

The key principle is that environmental CSR should move beyond activity counts and focus on measurable ecological and community outcomes.

Is ZCZP a conventional investment?

No. A ZCZP Instrument should not be confused with a conventional interest-bearing investment.

The instrument is called “zero coupon” because it does not provide a coupon or interest return, and “zero principal” because there is no conventional principal repayment. In the NPO context, the mechanism is fundamentally designed to channel funding towards social-purpose activities.

This distinction should be clearly communicated within corporate governance documentation. The company’s objective is CSR implementation and social impact, not financial return generation.

What are the benefits of the new mechanism?

The 2026 amendment can potentially provide several benefits to the CSR ecosystem.

First, it creates a formally recognised route for CSR funding through the Social Stock Exchange. Second, it can help eligible NPOs access institutional funding for defined projects. Third, the exchange-based framework can promote greater transparency and structured disclosures. Fourth, the 10% ceiling allows companies to experiment with the mechanism while continuing their broader CSR programmes through existing channels. Fifth, the impact-assessment exemption may simplify a specific compliance requirement for companies subscribing to such instruments. Finally, the mechanism can encourage social organisations to improve project design, financial discipline and impact reporting.

The effectiveness of the system, however, will depend on the quality of implementation and the willingness of both companies and NPOs to maintain high standards of accountability.

What should companies do before using ZCZP Instruments?

Companies should first understand the regulatory framework and assess whether the mechanism fits their CSR strategy. They should identify the percentage of annual CSR expenditure that could potentially be deployed through ZCZP, keeping the 10% ceiling in view.

The company should then identify eligible NPOs and conduct appropriate due diligence. It should evaluate project alignment, beneficiary relevance, geographic suitability, financial requirements, implementation capacity and expected outcomes.

The CSR committee and board should ensure that the transaction is properly documented within the company’s CSR governance framework. Finance and compliance teams should also maintain appropriate records of the subscription and related disclosures.

Most importantly, the company should not treat ZCZP subscription as a passive financial transaction. It remains part of the company’s CSR strategy and should therefore be connected to the company’s overall approach to social impact.

What should NGOs do to prepare?

NGOs interested in this mechanism should strengthen institutional systems before approaching the SSE.

They should maintain accurate audited financial statements, statutory registrations, governance records, project documentation, beneficiary data and impact indicators. They should also develop the ability to present projects in a structured format suitable for institutional funders.

An NGO should clearly distinguish between organisational activities and the specific project for which ZCZP funding is proposed. The project should have defined objectives, implementation timelines, budgets, beneficiaries and outcomes.

The organisation should also develop internal systems for monitoring fund utilisation and project progress. Strong documentation can increase the credibility of the organisation and help corporate partners understand the potential value of their contribution.

A new opportunity, but not a substitute for strong CSR strategy

The 2026 amendment should be understood as an additional mechanism rather than a replacement for conventional CSR implementation.

Direct implementation, partnerships with eligible implementing agencies, employee engagement, community programmes, institutional partnerships and other permissible CSR approaches will continue to have important roles.

ZCZP Instruments may be particularly useful where a company wants to support a clearly defined project implemented by an eligible NPO through the Social Stock Exchange framework.

The central question should therefore remain the same: Which CSR implementation mechanism can create the greatest measurable and sustainable impact while maintaining full regulatory compliance?

The Companies (CSR Policy) Amendment Rules, 2026 mark an important development in India’s CSR and social-finance ecosystem. Through the insertion of Rule 4A, companies can now undertake CSR activities through Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments issued by eligible NPOs registered with the Social Stock Exchange, subject to a 10% ceiling of the company’s total CSR expenditure for the relevant financial year. The amendment also provides an impact-assessment exemption for subscribing companies and establishes specific responsibilities for issuing NPOs, including completion of the funded project within a period not exceeding three succeeding financial years and treatment of unspent amounts after termination of listing.

The corresponding amendment to Schedule VII gives explicit recognition to subscription to ZCZP Instruments on the Social Stock Exchange as a CSR activity. Together, these changes create a formal regulatory pathway connecting corporate CSR expenditure with the Social Stock Exchange.

For companies, this development offers another tool for responsible deployment of CSR resources. For NGOs, it creates a potential new channel for institutional fundraising. For the wider social sector, it represents an opportunity to strengthen transparency, project discipline and impact-oriented financing.

At Drishti Foundation Trust, we believe that the future of CSR must be built around credible institutions, responsible partnerships, measurable outcomes and long-term community and environmental value. The ZCZP mechanism can contribute to that future when it is used thoughtfully, transparently and in accordance with the applicable regulatory framework.

Ultimately, the success of this new CSR route will not be determined simply by the amount of money raised through ZCZP Instruments. Its real success will be measured by whether those resources reach well-designed projects, strengthen communities, protect the environment and produce meaningful, measurable and sustainable impact.

The 2026 amendment therefore represents more than a new financial instrument. It is a significant step towards connecting India’s corporate CSR ecosystem with a more structured and transparent social-finance architecture through the Social Stock Exchange.

Note: This article is intended for general awareness and educational purposes. Companies and NGOs should review the applicable MCA, Companies Act, SEBI and Social Stock Exchange requirements, along with professional advice, before undertaking a ZCZP transaction.

“Reach out to explore collaborations, discover our initiatives, and contribute to creating meaningful, lasting change.”

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DrishtiFoundationTrust/

Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/drishtifoundation

Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/drishtifoundationtrust

Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/company/drishtifoundationtrust

Twitter : https://www.twitter.com/dftindia